Tuesday, July 11, 2017
http://www.snopes.com/food/tainted/roundupwheat.asp
Is it me or is snopes vindicating Monsanto and big agri of anything nefoarious?
http://www.snopes.com/2017/07/11/stan-romanek/
In the Orwellian universe the first step is accusing the target of child pornography. The second step is conducting a search of the target's home and 'discovering' that no child pornography exists on the target's computers. Then a series of 'USB drives' i.e. evidence with no evidence chain leading to the target are 'discovered' 'in the home' of the target.
Could you withstand such an investigation? Could I? It's like being accused by a stripper of touching. When the burly bouncers show up to escort you to the curb do you resist? Argue your innocence? Or do you haply accept that a miserable group of low lives have dealt you a blow from which your strip club night will not recover?
In this case the miserable group of low lives are police, prosecutors, judges and snopes.com which unsurprisingly sings the chorus of "get back into your hovels and keep shoveling".
Note the tone of the article, for a bombshell illumination of the dastardly deeds of Stan Romanacek its surprisingly lean on facts and heavy on film critique. Why would snopes.com be so interested in the fakability of segments of Stan's life story in an expose about this malicious sexual predator's wily ways? It's almost as if the entire point of the article was to shatter Stan's credibility with the masses. You motherfuckers are a joke. Stan will be replaced, convict him, slam the door on him, you can't hide the truth ...THEY ARE OUT THERE, and they are coming for you.
Could you withstand such an investigation? Could I? It's like being accused by a stripper of touching. When the burly bouncers show up to escort you to the curb do you resist? Argue your innocence? Or do you haply accept that a miserable group of low lives have dealt you a blow from which your strip club night will not recover?
In this case the miserable group of low lives are police, prosecutors, judges and snopes.com which unsurprisingly sings the chorus of "get back into your hovels and keep shoveling".
Note the tone of the article, for a bombshell illumination of the dastardly deeds of Stan Romanacek its surprisingly lean on facts and heavy on film critique. Why would snopes.com be so interested in the fakability of segments of Stan's life story in an expose about this malicious sexual predator's wily ways? It's almost as if the entire point of the article was to shatter Stan's credibility with the masses. You motherfuckers are a joke. Stan will be replaced, convict him, slam the door on him, you can't hide the truth ...THEY ARE OUT THERE, and they are coming for you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)